期刊简介
《中国肺癌杂志》(CN 12-1395/R, ISSN 1009-34197)——我国唯一一本国内外公开发行的肺癌专病杂志,创刊于1998年,为中文月刊。中国工程院院士孙燕教授担任本刊名誉主编,天津医科大学总医院我国著名肺癌专家周清华教授任主编。另有来自美国、丹麦、意大利和日本的多位国际著名肺癌专家以及国内的100多位从事肺癌基础研究和临床防治工作的知名专家担任副主编和编委。 本刊以提高我国肺癌基础研究和临床研究水平,提供学习交流和学术争鸣的园地,促进国际学术交流,推动我国肺癌防治工作的发展为办刊宗旨。本刊被Medline/Pubmed/Index Medicus、DOAJ、CAB Abstracts、CSA、EBSCO-CINAHL、Global Health、Index Copernicus、Elsevier EMBASE/SCOPUS、CA、HINARI等数据库收录,已被收录为国家科学技术部中国科技论文统计源期刊,为国家肿瘤学核心期刊。 本刊开设的主要栏目有报道肺癌防治研究的最新成果,基础与临床以及边缘学科等领域的论著、综述、述评、讲座、临床经验、病理(例)报道、新技术、新理论、短篇报道、继续教育和各类消息等。
往期目录
-
2000
-
2001
-
2002
-
2003
-
2004
-
2005
-
2006
-
2007
-
2008
-
2009
-
2010
-
2011
-
2012
-
2013
-
2014
-
2015
-
2016
-
2017
-
2018
首页>中国肺癌杂志

- 杂志名称:中国肺癌杂志
- 主管单位:中国科学技术协会
- 主办单位:中国抗癌协会 中国防痨协会 天津医科大学总医院
- 国际刊号:1009-3419
- 国内刊号:12-1395/R
- 出版周期:月刊
期刊荣誉:国家科学技术部中国科技论文统计源期刊期刊收录:CSCD 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊(含扩展版), 上海图书馆馆藏, 国家图书馆馆藏, 剑桥科学文摘, 文摘与引文数据库, 农业与生物科学研究中心文摘, CA 化学文摘(美), 哥白尼索引(波兰), 北大核心期刊(中国人文社会科学核心期刊), 万方收录(中), 统计源核心期刊(中国科技论文核心期刊), 医学文摘, 知网收录(中), 维普收录(中)
Improving Biomarker Development and Assessment: Standards for Study Design
关键词:PROBE study design, biomarker
摘要:Background: The Early Detection Research Network (EDRN), NCI funded and investigator driven, has the mission to evaluate biomarkers for their clinical utilities in cancer risk prediction, diagnosis, early detection, and prognosis. Abundant cancer biomarkers reported in literature yet few are used in clinics. Therefore, the emphasis of the EDRN is biomarker validation. Although schema for a phased approach to development exists and guidelines are available for study reporting, a coherent and comprehensive set of guideline for a definitive biomarker validation study design have not been delineated.Methods: We proposed PROBE study design, Prospective specimen collec-tion and Retrospective Blinded Evaluation, for pivotal definitive evaluation of the accuracy of a classification biomarker. A detailed formulation of all aspects of the design is provided. Four tables itemize aspects that relate to (i) the Clinical Context; (ii) Performance Criteria; (iii) the Biomarker test; and (iv) Study power and termination. Alternative designs and strategies were contrasted to illustrate the merit of PROBE design.Results: The ideas are applied to studies of biomarkers the intended use of which is for disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Two EDRN valida-tion studies (breast cancer and prostate cancer) were used as examples to elucidate PROBE design.Conclusion: Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literaturewould be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed closely. We urge the adoption of the design as standard of practice for pivotal evaluation of the classification accuracy ofbiomarkers.
友情链接